Rescind the Ban on Attending Interfaith Weddings

Opinion

By Jason A. Miller

Published August 25, 2010, issue of September 03, 2010.
  • Print
  • Author Archive
  • Forward Forum

When I decided to become a rabbi in 1996, I visited the Jewish Theological Seminary, my future rabbinical school. Along with sitting in on some classes, I stayed in the apartment of four first-year rabbinical students. I still recall a discussion we had at the Shabbat dinner table. One of the rabbinical students raised the question of what would happen if one of their siblings became engaged to a non-Jew — could they even attend the wedding?

The Rabbinical Assembly, Conservative Judaism’s rabbinic organization, lists attendance by a rabbi at a wedding between a Jew and a non-Jew as a violation of its “Standards of Religious Practice” in its code of professional conduct. The underlying rationale is that a rabbi’s attendance at an interfaith wedding would be perceived as condoning intermarriage.

While the recent wedding of Chelsea Clinton to Marc Mezvinsky renewed age-old debates about intermarriage, for Conservative rabbis in particular it has spurred discussion about the R.A.’s policy. This is because JTS’s chancellor, Arnold Eisen, attended the couple’s post-wedding reception.

Eisen — who became close to the groom when he was a professor at the couple’s alma mater, Stanford University — is not a rabbi. Yet chancellors of JTS are considered by some to be the Conservative movement’s titular heads. Is it possible for the chancellor of JTS to attend an interfaith wedding reception without implicitly sending a message either about the Conservative movement’s attitude toward intermarriage or, more specifically, about the appropriateness of the R.A.’s policy?

In truth, if Eisen were not such a high-profile figure, he would not have been breaking new ground. In practice, the R.A.’s policy has left considerable room for interpretation. Some

R.A. members distinguish between attendance at an interfaith wedding ceremony and the reception that follows. Others disagree, arguing that the wedding ceremony is directly connected to the actual ceremony and attendance at either could be perceived as tacit approval. Some rabbis, however, have simply flouted the policy, quietly attending interfaith wedding ceremonies of relatives and friends.

The R.A.’s code states that violations of standards of religious practice “usually result in expulsion from the Rabbinical Assembly.” Rabbis who officiate at interfaith weddings face the prospect of stern sanctions from the R.A., and in practice have generally chosen to resign their membership in order to avoid public controversy.

I am not, however, aware of any instances in which rabbis who simply attended interfaith weddings (and I know more than a few who have) faced repercussions from the R.A. Indeed, one widely held view among R.A. members is that the real purpose of the attendance ban is to give Conservative rabbis who personally oppose attending such weddings a ready excuse when invited.

Nevertheless, the policy presents many of us with profoundly difficult choices. A couple of years after I was ordained at JTS, I chose not to attend my first cousin’s wedding to a lovely, albeit non-Jewish, young woman. I explained that my wife and I would not be attending because my rabbinic association forbade it. My refusal to attend (he knew better than to ask for me to officiate) led to animosity from other relatives and a fractured relationship among cousins.

In light of the fallout from that decision, I made a much different decision several years later. When I received an invitation to the wedding of a close childhood friend, I didn’t allow the fact that her bashert wasn’t a “member of the tribe” to deter me from replying “yes” on the RSVP card. I don’t believe anyone in attendance saw my presence as an acceptance of intermarriage. My intention was only to show support for my long-time friend and to ensure the couple knew that the Jewish community wasn’t turning its back on them.

The R.A. isn’t about to allow its members to officiate at interfaith weddings. But the attendance ban, which is listed in the code of conduct alongside the officiation ban, is a different issue. This policy forces rabbis to choose between violating a rule and slighting loved ones. The policy, enforced or not, adds pain to an already difficult situation for families. It sends a message that Judaism puts tribalism before dignity and respect.

It is time for the Rabbinical Assembly to rescind its policy banning its members from attending interfaith weddings as guests. If outreach to interfaith couples is a goal for our movement and our community, then the insult of refusing to attend their weddings is counterproductive.

Rabbi Jason A. Miller is rabbi of Tamarack Camps and director of the Kosher Michigan certification initiative.


  • Print
  • Author Archive
  • Forward Forum

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Comments (34)

Loading... Logging you in...
Close

Login with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID

JonnyGee's avatar

JonnyGee · 5 days ago

The writer's request defines what is wrong with the Conservative movement. It wants to be all things to everybody - a big tent - catering to the lowest common denominator. Instead, it ends up being nothing to most people. The movement has lost its way and sense of identity. What do you represent? Seems to me you are moving further and further away from authentic Judaism, and replacing it with an ersatz Americanized version, soon-to-be indistinguishable from what is considered Judaism by those calling themselves Reform Jews.
i don't see any reasons why anyone should be banned or discouraged from attending an interfaith marriage. unless, of course, they are delusional enough to believe that their refusal to attend the nuptials will A) make said nuptials not exist or B) bring the couple closer to judaism. in which case i would say that such people SHOULD be discouraged from attending, because reality--the harshest mistress--will whack them over the head before they are ready for it.
Jonathan's avatar

Jonathan · 5 days ago

Atta-boy! Rabbi J Keep moving the movement to more untenable positions! Do we really want our rabbis attending our family's interfaith weddings? Are so many of our families so dumbed down to think that a rabbi with some fealty to halacha can justify celebrating an interfaith wedding? Do we really want the rabbi there just to say something like, I can't marry you but I can say the blessing over the champagne toast mixture of Kedem and Christian Brothers? Hey I guess so. Just recently the USCJ had a webinar about inviting in intermarrieds to Conservative Jewish life and the aches and pains so many in the movement have when their aren't enough inviting events for intermarrieds. So you are just another voice in the popular call within Conservative Judaism to put more resolve into what we hope intermarriaeds want to hear while sacrificing away the work needed to keep all those who actually married other Jews because it mattered to them to marry a Jew. So many services to the intramarried will not exist as we keep working to bring intermarrieds in. And we will continue to lose our ties to what really matters. Rabbi J: Where are the aches and pains within the Conservative Judaism for those who leave because they can't find enough fellow congregants who observe Shabbat or kashrut? Where are the aches and pains because the adult education opportunities in a lot of our shuls consistently stop at such a remedial level? (In my town I don't think a whole page of talmud has been taught by any local Conservative rabbi to its congregants in decades.) Where are the aches and pains within the Conservative movement when line staff workers are not provided with health insurance or living wages?
By the way Rabbi J. I have an idea for your next article. Can you tell us how well the movement has been doing in conducting commitment ceremonies for homosexuals? You know we are coming to the 4 year anniversary of the Nevins teshuva where gays (as long as men commit to no anal sex between them) and lesbians could have commitment ceremonies. What is it like these days for Conservative Rabbis when they counsel or conduct these ceremonies when so many in the gay and lesbian community at large want homosexual marriage? One could argue well that the Nevins teshuva is behind the times already. When is the movement going to allow forgo this commitment sham and move to full marriage ceremonies for homosexuals? Could you also tell us about what the Conservative movement is doing for gays and lesbians when they don't want to be committed to their partner anymore? Surely there must be some kind of "get" for homosexual committed relationships but the Nevins teshuva didn't address that. And I haven't seen a teshuva from the movement since four years ago address this point. So please Rabbi J. it's easy to see that your article today simply follows what a lot of Conservative Jews hope for - to ignore intermarriage as a problem. Give it to us straight about gays too.
hershele's avatar

hershele · 5 days ago

If the bride is Jewish, then the children will be 100% Jewish (no such thing as half-Jewish anwhere except in the Nurumberg Laws). Accepting the bride, her new husband and,eventually, the children into the fold will add new blood and gentic diversity, a good thing, to the tribe.
That solves half the problem. The other half our great rabbinic minds will have to work out for themselves.
What else can I do for you?
Hershel.
Exclusion of an intermarried couple only pushes the Jewish spouse away from Judaism. Is that what we really want? I married an non-Jew in a Jewish ceremony, and we are raising our children as Jews.

Interestingly enough, my husband used to be Mormon (he is agnostic now), until his mother demanded that I convert so we could have a traditional LDS temple marriage... "no son of mine is marrying a non-Mormon," she said. I refused, and we have no contact with her anymore. She refused to accept her son's marriage to a Jew and her daughter's marriage to a Lutheran, and all that's done is drive the family apart.

Let's get our priorities straight.
If you believe a Jewish person's bashert can be a non-Jew, then I suppose there's nothing wrong with your argument.

Of course, just because you say so doesn't mean that you aren't stomping of 5000 years of tradition and belief. If you say pork is kosher, is it?

This is an issue of money. Conservative rabbis want to officiate at intermarriages to increase their income. Most people would rather have a rabbi who sticks to his principals that one is afraid at offending someone who violates tradition and law.
This is what's wrong with liberals in general.

So worried about offending people that they lose sight of what really matters.

Not offending people becomes more important than the underlying breach.

Can you imagine an NBA player intentionally missing a game-tying free throw because he was worried that some fan for the other team might be upset if he makes it?

How can a Rabbi think like this?
well, ya, this makes sense if you value your role as friend more than that of spiritual advisor
Charles P. Cohen's avatar

Charles P. Cohen · 5 days ago

>>> . It sends a message that Judaism puts tribalism before dignity and respect. <<<

When the exiled Jews returned from Babylon, they were required to give up their non-Jewish wives, and children born to those wives! See Ezra, chapter 10.

Judaism has always been torn between "tribalism", and "dignity and respect". Treat the stranger the same as the homeborn -- but don't marry him/her.

It's not a new conflict, and it has no new solutions _within the tradition_. If one is willing to move _outside_ the tradition, of course, more choices open up, both for rabbis and spouses.

Charles
1 reply · active 4 days ago
I am so tired of reading this sort of stuff. So you want to go to an intermarriage. Good for you. Do we need an op-ed piece over it?

Why don't Conservative Rabbis & educators start doing what they are supposed to do - worry about and work for other Jews. My not so affiliated brother & my more affiliated sister in law joined a massive conservative synagogue (so big it has 2 branches). They pay huge amounts of money for dues. The kids are in Hebrew school there. They go to services sometimes.

Do you think the Rabbi(s) or Cantor(s) ever invited them for a Shabbat meal? A visit to their Sukkah? I mean....they have been members for like 13 years or so.......

To stand up for gay rights, intermarried couples, ethical hechshers.....you name it - there is always plenty of time. You Conservative, JTS folks have plenty of time to do all these public, popular things.

But what are you doing to help my nephews stay Jewish?? Seriously.......
2 replies · active 4 days ago
What are his parents doing? Kadima, USY, Ramah? Rabbis can motivate but it has to come from the home first.
My brother is in his 40's. the fact he even joined a shul is somewhat of a miracle. He pays huge dues. Sorry, in a shul with so much buidling wealth & staff - they could do a better job.

The shul is vapid of meaning and so is the Conservative movement. The gay Rabbi issue or ethical hechsher issue touch very FEW average Jews. I am not saying drop your beliefs but....conservative movement......what about Shabbat invites? holiday invites? etc etc etc
With all due respect's avatar

With all due respect · 4 days ago

I'm also a CJ (not a Rabbi) and faced a similar decision a few years ago when I did not attend the intermarriage of one of my closest friends from College. I was honest with my friend from the beginning...yes, he was sad that I would not be there but he understood that my not attending was not a comment on our friendship. To the contrary, he respected my faith and conviction and felt that HE would be in breach of our friendship if he were to pressure me to attend. He is still married, we are still friends and it appears that my loyalty to tradition has possibly made him more, not less, interested interested in being a part of The Jewish Community.
1 reply · active 4 days ago
Kol Hakavod. People are attracted to truth & real things..
Ezra is refered to as a "scribe", not a "prophet".

Comparing Ezra's actions to the Nuremberg Laws completely lacks historical context. Ezra was working to reconstitute a people that was returning from exile, and took rather extreme measures. Restoring the Jewish People was clearly not the aim of the Nazis. Comparison of the two, especially without context, is misleading, and smacks more of diatribe than debate.
Could it be said that Germany, through the Nuremberg Laws, was also "working to reconsitute a people" who had suffered from warfare and dismemberment of their community?

What's the difference?
Rabbi Dr. Rosenberg's avatar

Rabbi Dr. Rosenberg · 4 days ago

This must be Purim Torah. Next, the movement will be told it is ok. to eat non-kosher at events. . Rabbi Dr. Bernhard Rosenberg
Adam Magy's avatar

Adam Magy · 4 days ago

Once again Jason, we'll have to agree to disagree.
If your family cannot accept your commitment to your faith, why should you have to compromise who you are? The intolerance and alienation you alluded to are clearly present; they were directed against you by your own family.
Your article has proven a greater need for adherence to our traditions, certainly not less.
Rabbi Laura Baum's avatar

Rabbi Laura Baum · 4 days ago

Kudos to Rabbi Miller - I agree complete that if outreach to interfaith couples is a goal for the Conservative movement and community, then the insult of refusing to attend interfaith weddings is counterproductive.

Intermarriage is a reality - one we should embrace because it is here to stay. As a liberal rabbi, I officiate at intermarriages. I have a very hard time understanding why there are rabbis out there who welcome interfaith families as dues-paying members of their congregations but won't even show up at their weddings. To me, that is a disgrace.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Intermarriage is a reality only by conservative rabbis like you, just like bad habits of some are here only because it is encouraged. Kudos to the ones that dont acknowledge or show up at interfaith weddings. They believe there is another world where every person regardless of status will be put to a din and mishpat. You need to reducate yourself on the truth of judaism before you officiate at Rabbi. There is no such a thing as a liberal Rabbi, only in name. The recruiting of jews and the acceptance is false. Those Jews do not stay true to the end. It is when a Jew feels the real pull when they come back to the faith they either left or never learned about, and that is when true satisfaction is felt.
Interfaith's avatar

Interfaith · 1 hour ago

Yasher koach, Rabbi Baum! I am Jewish in an interfaith relationship and it's people like you that keep me feeling connected to Judaism. When reading some of the hateful anti-intermarriage comments and articles I find myself hanging on by a thread to Judaism, so you have no idea how important it is that you officiate at, and are supportive of, intermarriages and talk about it publicly. People like you are the reason Judaism will survive.
Yoine Cohen's avatar

Yoine Cohen · 4 days ago

As a Charedi Orthodox Jew, I hope the Rabbi succeeds with his proposal. The more the Conservatives move away from traditional Judaism, the better and clearer the line of demarcation between them and Orthodoxy becomes and I am all for that.

As mentioned before, this line "I didn’t allow the fact that her bashert wasn’t a “member of the tribe” to deter me from replying “yes” on the RSVP card." reveals a lot about the Rabbi and his true beliefs.
Did he forget or reject the talmud, on what the term "bashert" is based on?
Bashert is the a Yiddish term of pre-ordained destiny, based on the Talmud that everybody has his/her spouse pre-ordained before his/her birth. [bas ploni l'ploni'.] see: http://kodesh.snunit.k12.il/b/l/l3501_002a.htm
Rabbi Miller should/could not claim that he used this word casually. It rather honestly shows where he is coming from,
I fully support his efforts on behalf the Conservative movement.
Ashamed's avatar

Ashamed · 3 days ago

I have been a proud CJ for all of my adult life. That pride is quickly dissipating. Very quickly. Rabbi, and I call you that with the sincere hopes that you will become one, you are so terribly wrong. Your own language is so embarrassing and inappropriate. You accuse your fellow Jews of "tribalism".......funny, I thought Judaism was a religion, a faith, a matter of beliefs. I do not attend intermarriages. Ceremony or reception. Is there really a difference? Come on! The reception is the celebration of the ceremony and attending either is equally inappropriate. If the Chancellor of the JTS actually attended the Clinton intermarriage, he really needs to resign. What did he eat at the dinner btw? I want my children's role models to be just that: role models. What travesty is left in Conservative Judaism? In all honesty, I am sickened by the message of your article. You should be ashamed. And, of course, so should Chancellor Eisen.
Larry Steinmetz's avatar

Larry Steinmetz · 3 days ago

Females trying to pray with the men at the Kotel, gay marriages, rabbi's performing marriages on Shabbat, weddings where tref is openly served, and on and on. The liberals in the Jewish community decide that their politics, not Jewish law, determine what being a Jew is all about. Is there any wonder the number of Jews have declined in America? Judiasm is not a smorgasbord where you can come to the buffet table and pick and choose what being Jewish is all about. Our faith has history, laws, and tradition, but unfortunately, far left members are not content with Judiasm as it IS, and decide to define it for what they think it should be to cater to their own left wing politics and values. It's no accident that the least observant are the least supportive of Israel and the most pro Obama.
1 reply · active 3 days ago
Almost Agree's avatar

Almost Agree · 3 days ago

Agree with most of your post EXCEPT to your objection regarding women Davening at The Kotel.
Dr. Barry Blum's avatar

Dr. Barry Blum · 3 days ago

My rabbi once told me that he thought that when a marriage is between a man and a woman, it's already a mixed marriage. I'm not a rabbi but in the absence of a rabbi on the Big Island for decades, and as I was president of the Jewish congregation here, I became licensed by the State of Hawaii to become a "marriage officiant." When I perform an interfaith ceremony, I use the words: "Harei ot mekudeshet lee bitaba'at zoo, kiminchag Mosheh v'Yisrael" instead of "kidat." The wedding ceremony follows the customs of a Jewish marriage but is not of course, according to the law. I perform interfaith marriages because I want to perpetuate Judaism and make the wedding a positive Jewish experience for both bride and groom, with the hope that this will increase the likelihood that they will create a Jewish home together. I succeed sometimes.
Rabbi Dr. Rosenberg's avatar

Rabbi Dr. Rosenberg · 1 day ago

A RA colleague e mailed and called me pompous because I believe it is wrong to attend an intermarriage ceremony and or reception. I have never been considered pompous but I will not attend an intermarriage ceremony of anyone in my family or extended family. As a Rabbi we stand for certain values. Intermarriage is not a mitzvah. While I work with intermarriage families and respect them , I do not and never will condone intermarriage. My Semicha means something to me of great value. I will never condone an act which is against our survival as a people. Call be whatever you want but I will fight for what I believe in. If any of my children intermarried, which thank G-d, they did not, I would not attend the ceremony or reception. I would love them and not sit shiva, but I still would not attend. Attendance indicates I condone the act which I do not. I am sensitive to those who have children who intermarried, but my PERSONAL values remain the same.
The answer is lying right in front of us. Let us work harder to bring more non-Jews, particularly friends and loved ones, into the community as converts to Judaism.
1 reply · active 12 hours ago
That is not what you are here for, if you are jewish. A non jew has only to adhere to the then commandments. You are not to encourage converts, rather discourage.

TzviS, go back to yeshiva, and learn halachis of converting.
Rabbi Tony Jutner's avatar

Rabbi Tony Jutner · 19 hours ago

The answer is lying right in front of us...How right you are. The answer is NewJudaism, the only way that Judaism can stay relevant in the 21st century. I have discarded traditional tribalism, what famed historian Arnold Toynbee called fossil Judaism, and replaced it with Social Justice, Economic Justice, and the RIght of Return of Endogenous Peoples, especially the Palestinians. I wll intermarry Jews, non-Jews, gays, whoever wants my services so long as they make a formal committment to the BDS movement. Brandeis has already become a stronghold of NewJudaism, and it is only a matter of time before JTS falls to NewJudaism, just as Jerusalem fell to the Caliph Omar in 638. We are the 800 pound guerilla
1 reply · active 4 hours ago
Are you sure that you are a Rabbi? What do you stand for? Social Justice & economic justice are found in the Torah. Can I marry a turnip if it makes me feel good?
Judaism is a religion, a faith, a matter of beliefs. If learning the history, laws, and tradition of Judaism is good for you then it should be good for another. Why deny that goodness to others?

Post a new comment

    Posting as levifishman (Logout)

    Comments by


    Follow Us
     

    Most Read Articles