When I decided to become a rabbi in 1996, I visited the Jewish Theological Seminary, my future rabbinical school. Along with sitting in on some classes, I stayed in the apartment of four first-year rabbinical students. I still recall a discussion we had at the Shabbat dinner table. One of the rabbinical students raised the question of what would happen if one of their siblings became engaged to a non-Jew — could they even attend the wedding?
The Rabbinical Assembly, Conservative Judaism’s rabbinic organization, lists attendance by a rabbi at a wedding between a Jew and a non-Jew as a violation of its “Standards of Religious Practice” in its code of professional conduct. The underlying rationale is that a rabbi’s attendance at an interfaith wedding would be perceived as condoning intermarriage.
While the recent wedding of Chelsea Clinton to Marc Mezvinsky renewed age-old debates about intermarriage, for Conservative rabbis in particular it has spurred discussion about the R.A.’s policy. This is because JTS’s chancellor, Arnold Eisen, attended the couple’s post-wedding reception.
Eisen — who became close to the groom when he was a professor at the couple’s alma mater, Stanford University — is not a rabbi. Yet chancellors of JTS are considered by some to be the Conservative movement’s titular heads. Is it possible for the chancellor of JTS to attend an interfaith wedding reception without implicitly sending a message either about the Conservative movement’s attitude toward intermarriage or, more specifically, about the appropriateness of the R.A.’s policy?
In truth, if Eisen were not such a high-profile figure, he would not have been breaking new ground. In practice, the R.A.’s policy has left considerable room for interpretation. Some
R.A. members distinguish between attendance at an interfaith wedding ceremony and the reception that follows. Others disagree, arguing that the wedding ceremony is directly connected to the actual ceremony and attendance at either could be perceived as tacit approval. Some rabbis, however, have simply flouted the policy, quietly attending interfaith wedding ceremonies of relatives and friends.
The R.A.’s code states that violations of standards of religious practice “usually result in expulsion from the Rabbinical Assembly.” Rabbis who officiate at interfaith weddings face the prospect of stern sanctions from the R.A., and in practice have generally chosen to resign their membership in order to avoid public controversy.
I am not, however, aware of any instances in which rabbis who simply attended interfaith weddings (and I know more than a few who have) faced repercussions from the R.A. Indeed, one widely held view among R.A. members is that the real purpose of the attendance ban is to give Conservative rabbis who personally oppose attending such weddings a ready excuse when invited.
Nevertheless, the policy presents many of us with profoundly difficult choices. A couple of years after I was ordained at JTS, I chose not to attend my first cousin’s wedding to a lovely, albeit non-Jewish, young woman. I explained that my wife and I would not be attending because my rabbinic association forbade it. My refusal to attend (he knew better than to ask for me to officiate) led to animosity from other relatives and a fractured relationship among cousins.
In light of the fallout from that decision, I made a much different decision several years later. When I received an invitation to the wedding of a close childhood friend, I didn’t allow the fact that her bashert wasn’t a “member of the tribe” to deter me from replying “yes” on the RSVP card. I don’t believe anyone in attendance saw my presence as an acceptance of intermarriage. My intention was only to show support for my long-time friend and to ensure the couple knew that the Jewish community wasn’t turning its back on them.
The R.A. isn’t about to allow its members to officiate at interfaith weddings. But the attendance ban, which is listed in the code of conduct alongside the officiation ban, is a different issue. This policy forces rabbis to choose between violating a rule and slighting loved ones. The policy, enforced or not, adds pain to an already difficult situation for families. It sends a message that Judaism puts tribalism before dignity and respect.
It is time for the Rabbinical Assembly to rescind its policy banning its members from attending interfaith weddings as guests. If outreach to interfaith couples is a goal for our movement and our community, then the insult of refusing to attend their weddings is counterproductive.
Rabbi Jason A. Miller is rabbi of Tamarack Camps and director of the Kosher Michigan certification initiative.
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.
Logging you in... Comments by IntenseDebate
JonnyGee · 5 days ago
ari · 5 days ago
Jonathan · 5 days ago
By the way Rabbi J. I have an idea for your next article. Can you tell us how well the movement has been doing in conducting commitment ceremonies for homosexuals? You know we are coming to the 4 year anniversary of the Nevins teshuva where gays (as long as men commit to no anal sex between them) and lesbians could have commitment ceremonies. What is it like these days for Conservative Rabbis when they counsel or conduct these ceremonies when so many in the gay and lesbian community at large want homosexual marriage? One could argue well that the Nevins teshuva is behind the times already. When is the movement going to allow forgo this commitment sham and move to full marriage ceremonies for homosexuals? Could you also tell us about what the Conservative movement is doing for gays and lesbians when they don't want to be committed to their partner anymore? Surely there must be some kind of "get" for homosexual committed relationships but the Nevins teshuva didn't address that. And I haven't seen a teshuva from the movement since four years ago address this point. So please Rabbi J. it's easy to see that your article today simply follows what a lot of Conservative Jews hope for - to ignore intermarriage as a problem. Give it to us straight about gays too.
hershele · 5 days ago
That solves half the problem. The other half our great rabbinic minds will have to work out for themselves.
What else can I do for you?
Hershel.
Ayelet · 5 days ago
Interestingly enough, my husband used to be Mormon (he is agnostic now), until his mother demanded that I convert so we could have a traditional LDS temple marriage... "no son of mine is marrying a non-Mormon," she said. I refused, and we have no contact with her anymore. She refused to accept her son's marriage to a Jew and her daughter's marriage to a Lutheran, and all that's done is drive the family apart.
Let's get our priorities straight.
Guest · 5 days ago
Of course, just because you say so doesn't mean that you aren't stomping of 5000 years of tradition and belief. If you say pork is kosher, is it?
This is an issue of money. Conservative rabbis want to officiate at intermarriages to increase their income. Most people would rather have a rabbi who sticks to his principals that one is afraid at offending someone who violates tradition and law.
moshe · 5 days ago
So worried about offending people that they lose sight of what really matters.
Not offending people becomes more important than the underlying breach.
Can you imagine an NBA player intentionally missing a game-tying free throw because he was worried that some fan for the other team might be upset if he makes it?
How can a Rabbi think like this?
guest · 5 days ago
Charles P. Cohen · 5 days ago
When the exiled Jews returned from Babylon, they were required to give up their non-Jewish wives, and children born to those wives! See Ezra, chapter 10.
Judaism has always been torn between "tribalism", and "dignity and respect". Treat the stranger the same as the homeborn -- but don't marry him/her.
It's not a new conflict, and it has no new solutions _within the tradition_. If one is willing to move _outside_ the tradition, of course, more choices open up, both for rabbis and spouses.
Charles
Mark J. Scher · 4 days ago
Shmuel · 4 days ago
Why don't Conservative Rabbis & educators start doing what they are supposed to do - worry about and work for other Jews. My not so affiliated brother & my more affiliated sister in law joined a massive conservative synagogue (so big it has 2 branches). They pay huge amounts of money for dues. The kids are in Hebrew school there. They go to services sometimes.
Do you think the Rabbi(s) or Cantor(s) ever invited them for a Shabbat meal? A visit to their Sukkah? I mean....they have been members for like 13 years or so.......
To stand up for gay rights, intermarried couples, ethical hechshers.....you name it - there is always plenty of time. You Conservative, JTS folks have plenty of time to do all these public, popular things.
But what are you doing to help my nephews stay Jewish?? Seriously.......
Joanne · 4 days ago
Shmuel · 4 days ago
The shul is vapid of meaning and so is the Conservative movement. The gay Rabbi issue or ethical hechsher issue touch very FEW average Jews. I am not saying drop your beliefs but....conservative movement......what about Shabbat invites? holiday invites? etc etc etc
With all due respect · 4 days ago
Shmuel · 4 days ago
Mark J. Scher · 4 days ago
Ezra, so-called "Prophet" and High Priest of the 2nd Temple Period was the leading proponent of genetic defined Judaism. In The Book of Ezra, Chapter 9, verse 2 he refers to Jews as the "holy race."
In Chapter 10, verse 3 he includes not only non-Jewish wives but also their children, i.e even those with one non-Jewish grandparent* are to be expelled.
Ezra goes on in Chapter 10 verse 8 that the chief officers and elders are to confiscate all of the transgressor's property** and to expel him from the community.
Chapter 10 verses 14, 16-17, and 44 goes on to describe how Ezra appointed a committee of inquiry into all marriages with non-Jewish wives who were to be expelled with their children.
Is it any wonder that with texts like The Book of Ezra that the Conservative and Orthodox rabbinate finds itself in their position today.
Mark
*It is worth noting that the 1935 Nuremberg Race Laws defined a Jew as requiring at least two Jewish grandparents, i.e Ezra one-ups the Nazis in that respect.
**The Nazi's seizure of Jewish-owned property mirrors the similar injunction expounded by Ezra, as noted above.
Avi · 2 days ago
Comparing Ezra's actions to the Nuremberg Laws completely lacks historical context. Ezra was working to reconstitute a people that was returning from exile, and took rather extreme measures. Restoring the Jewish People was clearly not the aim of the Nazis. Comparison of the two, especially without context, is misleading, and smacks more of diatribe than debate.
Baruch · 20 hours ago
What's the difference?
Rabbi Dr. Rosenberg · 4 days ago
Adam Magy · 4 days ago
If your family cannot accept your commitment to your faith, why should you have to compromise who you are? The intolerance and alienation you alluded to are clearly present; they were directed against you by your own family.
Your article has proven a greater need for adherence to our traditions, certainly not less.
Rabbi Laura Baum · 4 days ago
Intermarriage is a reality - one we should embrace because it is here to stay. As a liberal rabbi, I officiate at intermarriages. I have a very hard time understanding why there are rabbis out there who welcome interfaith families as dues-paying members of their congregations but won't even show up at their weddings. To me, that is a disgrace.
Hindy · 12 hours ago
Interfaith · 1 hour ago
Yoine Cohen · 4 days ago
As mentioned before, this line "I didn’t allow the fact that her bashert wasn’t a “member of the tribe” to deter me from replying “yes” on the RSVP card." reveals a lot about the Rabbi and his true beliefs.
Did he forget or reject the talmud, on what the term "bashert" is based on?
Bashert is the a Yiddish term of pre-ordained destiny, based on the Talmud that everybody has his/her spouse pre-ordained before his/her birth. [bas ploni l'ploni'.] see: http://kodesh.snunit.k12.il/b/l/l3501_002a.htm
Rabbi Miller should/could not claim that he used this word casually. It rather honestly shows where he is coming from,
I fully support his efforts on behalf the Conservative movement.
Ashamed · 3 days ago
Larry Steinmetz · 3 days ago
Almost Agree · 3 days ago
Dr. Barry Blum · 3 days ago
Rabbi Dr. Rosenberg · 1 day ago
TzviS · 19 hours ago
Guest · 12 hours ago
TzviS, go back to yeshiva, and learn halachis of converting.
Rabbi Tony Jutner · 19 hours ago
Asher · 4 hours ago
TzviS · 17 hours ago