The Strength of a Unified Voice

Filed under:

For a number of weeks, we have heard rumors that the various bodies of the Reconstructionist movement would be joining forces to become one entity. Some folks will blame it on economic pressure. Others will suggest that it makes sense—and it makes no sense for the various arms of any movement to be separate. So the merger of sorts was recently voted upon and now it is official. And while the Reform movement historically boasted of its strength coming from three strong separate and independent arms (URJ-the laity; CCAR-the rabbis; and HUC-JIR-the academic center), there is a movement in the works to bring these organizations together under one roof in New York, ostensibly to save on overhead and expenses. No news from the Conservative front on this issue, although we have seen in the Conservative movement’s new strategic plan that any institution can join the USCJ (no need to be a Conservative synagogue any longer to do so.)

As an organization that is grappling with what the Jewish community will look like in the future—(That is what our upcoming conference is all about. Check out www.Judaism for details and registration.)—it is important to try to understand what the decision of the Reconstructionists really represents on the wider landscape of the North American Jewish community.

It seems to me that as the distinctions between movements become less of a concern for those on the outside of the organized Jewish community (and frankly, for many on the inside, as well), the organizations within those movements are working harder to get their distinct message out. And the math looks simple. If we take two organizations and bring them together, the unified voice gets stronger.

Whether it is the Reconstructionist movement or any other, we have to do more than just escalating the intensity of the message. We have to make sure that the message resonates with those whom we seek to engage. And we have to make sure that the institutions that represent a particular ideology are welcoming to those who seek to participate in it.


  1. Let’s see now.

    The Reconstructionists are trying to save money. The Reform are trying to save money. The Conservatives are trying to save money.

    Who’s missing here? Wait, don’t tell me. Let me guess. Still thinking.

    BTW aren’t the Orthodox the most opposed to intermarriage?

    Still thinking. Don’t tell me. Its coming. Just wait. Its on the tip of my tongue.

    Comment by Dave — March 5, 2011 @ 10:22 pm

  2. Well, the Orthodox - especially up in Kiryas Joel - are just so used to living in poverty that they stopped trying to save money a long time ago:

    In this context, what does it matter that they are opposed to intermarriage? They’re barely able to feed their families.

    Comment by Jeff — March 6, 2011 @ 12:59 am

  3. They can feed their families (see ‘food stamps’). But yes they have lots of babies.

    Some edification for the many non-Orthodox who don’t have them, a baby is a human being who weighs usually between 5 and 8 pounds (I kid you not!)

    As a result of all these ‘babies’, the death of Orthodox Jews doesn not cause Orthodox congregations to shrink or disappear like non-Orthodox congregations.

    And these shrinking congregations is what is causing the non-Orthodox groups into economy-mode.

    Comment by Dave — March 6, 2011 @ 9:10 pm

  4. Food stamps, by definition, means they can barely feed their families. And because these Orthodox communities are having lots of babies - as they have for numerous generations - it means there are also just as many deaths. Ever wonder why the Orthodox still haven’t taken over the Jewish world in terms of demographics? Because just as many are coming into it as are departing.

    Comment by Jeff — March 6, 2011 @ 10:04 pm

  5. opposition to intermarriage is secondary when compared to high levels of poverty. the residents of Kiryas Joel (and others) can be against intermarriage all they want, but it doesn’t change the fact that they are in financial dire straits. Jewish education is important but so is being able to put food on the table.

    Comment by h. — March 9, 2011 @ 6:27 pm

Leave a comment



Click Here!